Diegetically this is meant to be read more as engineering than interface, but it does raise questions. The harness consists of a large circular housing that holds the cube and exposes one face of it towards a long runway that ends in a dais. If JARVIS were not handling everything, and this a placebo interface, well, I can think of at least 6 problems.įury walks past the dais they erected just because. That the suit could have flown itself to the pipe, handled the welding, and pipe-cuffing itself, freeing Tony to continue Tony Starking back in his office? It’s because he’s a megalomaniac and can’t not.That is has no apparent controls for literally anything (pause/play, end call, volume, brightness)? Not a problem, JARVIS will get it right most of the time, and will correct anything at a word from Tony.The fact that the video stays bright and persistent in his vision when he’s a) not looking it and b) piloting a weaponized environmental suit through New York City? Not an issue because JARVIS is handling the flying.“AUDIO ANAL YSIS” (kerning, people!) waveform that visually marks whether there is audio he could hear anyway? Hey, it looks futuristic.Random-width rule line around the video? Meh, it’s more distracting visual interest.Tony is a manager, and wants to know that the project is continuing apace. Distracting 3D, transparent, motion graphics of the tower? Not a problem.So, talking about how JARVIS is lying to Tony, and really all of this was to get us back here. If you accept that JARVIS is doing almost all the work, and Tony is an onboard manager, then it excuses almost all of the excesses of the interface.
0 kommentar(er)
